Sep. 4: I wish you all a fitting celebration of this Labor Day. My apologies for the long silence. My personal life and my health have combined to create a barrier between me and the work of We, the Irrelevant. I have piles of records to review and tally. I will do that just as soon as I possibly can. In the meantime, thanks for your patience.
Aug 20: Yesterday, Bill Lueders, journalist and president of the WI Freedom of Information Council, filed a lawsuit in Dane County Court against Rep. Scott Krug (R-Nekoosa). You can read it in its entirety here.
The following link takes you to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article on the lawsuit. http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2016/08/19/records-suit-filed-against-lawmaker/89008138/
We, the Irrelevant's post concerning Rep. Krug's curious designations of citizen contacts can be found by clicking here.
Aug. 15: More legislators' names have been posted in What Happened to the Emails. 17 legislators reported receiving no citizen correspondence regarding the takeover of Milwaukee Public Schools although their names were on multiple emails reported by other legislators.
Aug. 4: My "What Happened to the Emails?" Facebook post has reached over 6,000 people! Let's keep spreading it around. I have learned more about the disposal of records from two Senators' responses.
Sen. Erpenbach (D-Middleton) wrote: "Since January 1, of 2015 this office has received over 18,500 contacts from constituents alone. That does not include contacts from individuals that do not live in the 27th Senate District during the budget period which were responded to and were not kept by this office."
Sen. Alberta Darling (R-River Hills) wrote: "However, my office generally only tracks correspondence for constituents of the 8th Senate District."
I take these statements to mean that when we send an email to all legislators, it may be disposed of by those in whose districts we don't live.
Here is my view: Constituents may have put a legislator in office, but the decisions she/he makes affect all of us. All of us have a right to be heard on the safety of our water, the quality of our public schools, and the integrity of our electoral processes. These are statewide issues.
I suspect that We, the Irrelevant's totals for all of the issues queried via open records requests since October, 2015 would be far larger if document disposal were not permitted.
The open records law has been under attack by the GOP majority. They want to limit it even further. It's in our interest as citizens to push for broadening it. That's the only way we'll ever know what the people of Wisconsin think about proposed legislation when candidates don't tell voters their plans in advance.
July 29: New data regarding the Darling/Kooyenga MPS takeover plan will be posted this weekend. In the meantime, you may find the new page interesting: What Happened to the Emails?
July 20: A milestone - We, the Irrelevant's unique visitor count just topped 30,000!
If you want to become a part of our quest for accountability, join our ORRganization. If you have a Google account and have downloaded Google Drive, here are the documents you'll need to file and record the results from your own ORR.
Volunteers combed through hundreds of pages of documents furnished by the legislators. Each time a citizen mentioned the GAB, whether for or against dismantling it, a tally mark was made on a specially designed spreadsheet. Frequently, citizens included their feelings about two other concurrent bills - exempting politicians from secret John Doe investigations and changing campaign finance laws to allow coordination between candidates and special interest groups. These comments were also tallied.
Every effort was made to keep accurate tallies. Most records remain with the legislators. The volunteers would have had to pay hundreds of dollars in aggregate to have copies of all of them in order to document their results.
Anyone wanting proof of accuracy will have to submit their own ORR, asking for the same records within the same time period and be prepared to review records in the respective Chief Clerk's office or pay for the cost of searching, printing, and perhaps mailing them.
You can use the site in several ways: